|
|
JOSH BILLINGS ON LECTURING AND
HUMOR: David B. Kesterson Only a few personal letters by Yankee humorist Josh Billings (born Henry Wheeler Shaw, 1818-1885) are known to be extant.1 Billings either did not write copious personal letters, or they have not been preserved; or, though unlikely, there are undiscovered bundles of them hidden away somewhere. The first of the above observations is most likely to be accurate. For throughout the major part of his career, Billings wrote letters that were contributions to the pages of the New York Weekly, a leading story paper of the day. While out on the lecture circuit, or in his replies to correspondents, Josh would fill his column with letters on various topics. It thus seems somewhat unlikely that he had the time or the interest to write abundant personal letters since his energies were directed elsewhere. To discover any unpublished personal letters whatsoever by Josh Billings is significant enough. To discover letters with significant comments on his career, glimpses of his personality, and references to specific conditions and problems of the lecture system in nineteenth-century America is a singularly remarkable find. Of the three newly found letters2 reprinted and discussed below, two concern the most demanding facet of Billings careercomic lecturingwhile the third reveals some of his literary techniques and states his purpose as a humorist. After several years of abortive attempts, Billings became a successful platform humorist about 1865, the same year his first book of aphorisms and essays appeared, Josh Billings, Hiz Sayings. His status as a lecturer of national appeal was assured when, in 1869, he was invited by James Clark Redpath, manager of the new Boston Lyceum Bureau, to join his initial roster of speakers for the 1869/70 season. He accepted, and for the remainder of his lecturing career was closely associated with the Bureau, becoming an enviable "hundred-dollar-a-night man" as he read his lectures from fifty to one hundred nights a year in, as he said, "every town in Texas and California and in all the Canada towns and then down South from Baltimore across to Memphis and into New Orleans."3 The two letters dealing with Billings lecturing belong to the years 1880 and 1881, reflecting, thus, not a novice in the field but rather a seasoned performer tried in the ways of the lecture system and fully knowledgeable of its merits and hardships. The earlier and most significant epistle was written from New York and dated October 18, the year 1880 having been added later by another hand below the signature "Josh." The letter reads,
Pugh4
The letter is revelatory in that it alludes to some of the difficulties of the lecture circuit, it confirms Billings popularity and premium status as a lecturer, and -it details his lecture program for a specific engagement. When he requests that all the nights be "put in Pennsylvania, and to be easy stages, no night travel, and consecutive," Billings registers the ennui of a veteran performer having experienced years of traveling major distances between sometimes numerous, sometimes sparse engagements. Under the best of conditions the lecturing life was difficult, and though Billings found it "a grate deal ov phun,"5 he also complained in other writings of the hazards of unfriendly or scanty audiences, the occasional hostile newspaper reviews, the stereotyped, insufferable mannerisms of local lecture committee representatives who escorted the performer upon his arrival, and the inhibiting routines of the circuit such as having to remain in seclusion until lecture time.6 It is little wonder that he once dubbed comic lecturing "an unkommon pesky thing to do"7 and said it demanded, above all, "a man of grate strength."8 The advance booking for late January, the sale of twelve nights in Illinois, the $100 fee for a Chicago appearance all testify to Billings popularity on the circuit. The lecture program outlined in the letter details his customary approach and method of organization while performing and includes some of his most frequently discussed subjects. He gave his lectures catchall titles such as "Putty and Varnish," "Buty and the Beasts," "What I Know About Hotels," and his favorite, "Milk," and then
covered a multitude of disparate subjects in the course of an evening. Each subject, delivered in Billings terse, epigrammatic style, would consume anywhere from a very few to ten or fifteen minutes of a sixty to ninety minute lecture before giving way to another topic. The-nine items listed in this letter are quite typical of the range of subjects he would treat. His program includes several blocks of sayings interspersed among topics such as Long Branch (New Jersey), one of Billings favorite seaside resorts; Patience, a subject he usually treated rather seriously; Answers to Correspondents, usually playful answers to readers of his New York Weekly column9 (or hypothetical readers concocted by Billings); various hotel experiences; and then Marriage, one of his favorite topics, of which he spoke both sacredly and sarcastically. Billings wrote each lecture topic out in full; and on lecture night, while seated, read from the prepared text, the resulting humor heightened by his appearancethe dead-pan look on his naturally solemn face, the unusually long hair and scraggly beard adorning his massive head and face, the black suit without a tie.10 The second letter concerning lecturing is dated January 19, 1881, and is again written from New York. Josh briefly and curtly responds to an unidentified recipientobviously a lyceum booking agent of some sortwho has cancelled Billings engagements:
Care of Carleton11 Josh The letter, of course, registers the difficulties faced by the traveling lecturer: cancellations, great distances to be traveled, and inclement weather (since Josh would choose April if he could re-schedule). Aside from again showing Billings in the elite hundred dollar class and displaying his not surprising anger over having a block of engagements cancelled, the letter reveals something further. The emphatic underscorings throughout seem to suggest not only a Billings peeved over the cancellation, but one tired out in the last third of the grueling lecture season. It is most likely that the last half of the letter is not a bona fide request for re-scheduling, but rather a facetious suggestion as to what would constitute the ideal schedule. He would speak in Philadelphia for proximity to New York (and also, perhaps, with a hope to be received in "brotherly love" by the city thus tagged), he would travel in April for good weather, and he would have
his $100 top pay to boot. In reality, not only were long distances standard fare for lecturers, but the circuit usually ended in March, an inclement month in the Northeast. April, then, would normally not even be a possibility, thus again suggesting that Billings requested schedule is mere wishful thinking. He seems to be saying with a shrug and vain wish, "Im tired and want only the best conditionshere they are!" He probably never expected them to be met. The third letter has nothing specific to say about Billings lecturing, but it does contain an important statement of his aims as a humorist; and it also illustrates the epigrammatic style and moralistic tendency of his writings. Written fairly early in his career as writer and speaker1868, before he joined Redpaths Bureauthe statement of purpose in the second paragraph shows a man thoroughly sure of his mission, an objective Billings never lost sight of throughout his long career.
The humor of paragraph onethe understatement of "simply hint, that I intend to be with you" and the witty paradox concerning "misfortune"gives way quickly to the more serious utterances of paragraphs two and three. Billings declaration of purpose in the second paragraph is the clearest and most direct on record, an exact statement of his classic design as a humorist to please and instruct simultaneously. The last paragraph illustrates the epigrammatic and moralistic nature of his writings, both essential qualities in his works and lectures. In summary, all three letters illustrate typical aspects of Josh Billings works, his platform career, and his personality. They are important testimonials by a man who, so far as is known, did not often use the personal letter to express the details of his occupation, his objectives, and his frustrations. NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
1Besides a few letters
quoted wholly or in part by Cyril Clemens in Josh Billings, Yankee Humorist (Webster
Groves, Mo.: International Mark Twain Society, 1932), only twenty personal letters of any
significanceother than the ones reprinted hereare available. These letters are
located in the libraries of St. Johns Seminary, Indiana University, Harvard,
University of Rochester, Duke University, Haverford College, the Historical Society of
Pennsylvania, the University of Virginia, and in the New York Public Library.
2The letters turned up on the open market during the summer
of 1971, and I purchased them for my Billings collection.
|