|
|
"INSIDE BENCHLEY": THE EARLY DIARIES Wes D. Gehrig
Robert Benchley (1889-1945) inundated the public with his comic antihero from every conceivable source: syndicated comedy columnist, droll drama critic, comedic feature film actor/writer, and comedian of stage, screen (his own short subjects), and radio. During his lifetime twelve inspired volumes of collected essays appeared, with titles befitting the acknowledged period leader of "dementia praecox," or "crazy comedy," such as The Treasurers Report, and Other Aspects of Community Singing (1930), or From Bed to Worse Or Comforting Thoughts About the Bison (1934). In 1935 his How to Sleep won an Academy Award for best short subject. At the height of his fame, Current Biography 1941 stated: "One way to describe Robert Benchley is to say that he is all things to all menand all of them funny. He is probably the most versatile humorist in America, and the most successful."1 Benchley did not invent the modern antihero, whom humor historian Norris W. Yates describes as the "normal bumbler,"2 but he was pivotal in the mainstream American emergence of this character.3 Two celebrated comedy colleagues in this antihero evolution, James Thurber and S. J. Perelman, underlined the central importance of Benchley. Thurber observed, ". . . one of the greatest fears of the humorous writer is that he has spent three weeks writing something done faster and better by Benchley in l9l9."4 Perelman added, "A good, stuffy way to describe 85 Benchley would be to say that he occupies a unique position in American humor. He occupies nothing of the sort. He is top dog."5 In researching a biography of Benchley ("Mr. B" Or Comforting Thoughts About the Bison, [Greenwood Press, 1992]), I have uncovered a critically neglected practice ground for much of the humorists future antiheroic writingfive bound diaries for the years 19111914 and 1916. These volumes have been made available to the public by the family (see Boston Universitys "The Robert Benchley Collection," Special Collections, Mugar Memorial Library), and there is little previous reference to them outside his son Nathaniels pioneering biography (Robert Benchley, 1955).6 But even here diary references are sparsely used, with little sense of their comic nature. If and when other Benchley authors note the diaries, the tendency has been merely to recycle Nathaniels examples, such as Babette Rosmond does in her study (Robert Benchley: His Life and Good Times, 1970).7 This essay recognizes the importance of Benchleys more well-known early comedy efforts, such as being president (1911-1912) of Harvards famous humor journal, The Lampoon. But scholarly study of this periods work still finds Benchley awkward and belabored in his comedy.8 Consequently, his neglected diaries assume great importance. For instance, in an essay in Humor: International Journal of Humor Research (Volume 5-3, 1992, Purdue University), I use the diaries, and other sources, to explore the influence on Benchley of his mother. The essay in hand focuses on the diaries lighter-side entries and how they read as a five-pointed sneak preview to his later writing and the figure he helped bring to center stage in American humorthe comic antihero. First, and most fundamental, the casually breezy diary entries anticipate his future equally casual essay stylea lightness Benchley fan Woody Allen once likened to a "comic soufflé." (The meandering essay organization, or lack of it, gives the pieces a conversational tone which would later ease Benchleys transition to film short subjects, especially since those same essays were often the foundation of the shorts.) Though in truth these pieces were anything but spontaneous to produce, they fulfilled a pivotal need of most successful comedythey seemed spontaneous. Diarist Benchley demonstrated this style after seeing The Taming of the Shrew: "Now that W. Shakespeare is dead, I suppose I may say without offense that I didnt care much for his farce. . . ."9 Years later he observed in "Looking Shakespeare Over": ". . . the stuff that Will wrote, while all right to sit at home and read, does not lend itself to really snappy entertainment on the modern stage."10 Shakespeare is also an excellent subject to showcase Benchleys equally relaxed theatre criticism and just how directly it can be tied to the comedic essay. Sandwiched 86 in time between the diary and essay quotes, Benchley the reviewer observed: "Shakespeare is all right bound in limp leather . . . for personal use . . . but when recited by a company of players . . . the spoken words of the immortal Bard are like so many drops of rain on a tin roof. . . ."11 A second quintessential connection is that his diary entries, like the later essays, are often very funny. More to the point, they are generally exercises in comic frustration, the key antiheroic component. For example, "I gave the folks my weekly surprise [visit]. Shaved with fathers razor, nearly severing my ear," or:
Benchleys real life shaving adventure would have felt right at home in his later bathroom essay on "First Aid," where a "random investigator [more comedy paranoia] looking through my medicine chest for dental floss, would say in horror: You dont use Cuta-mint [for shaving nicks and such], do you? Didnt you read the latest bulletin of the Bleeders Research Division?"13 And his diary confessional on Sunday hay fever problems, slightly abated by the paper, could have served as a starting point for such diverse later Benchley pieces as "A Word About Hay Fever" ("One or two sneezes on arising is not abnormal, but nineteen [in rapid succession] indicate some derangement of the apparatus.") and "The Wreck of the Sunday Paper" (he asks: "What is to be done with people who cant read a Sunday paper without messing it all up?").14 Third, the common everyday topic demands of his, and most, diaries (despite the romantic notion of a diarys earthshaking contents) anticipate the generally non-political, non-issue nature of Benchleys antiheroic writing. It is as if to say, this comic character has enough trouble getting up in the morning, let alone solving world problems. Fittingly, Benchleys most frequent diary topic actually involved getting up. For example: "Forgot to fix my alarm last night and slept till 9:10, which necessitated a parody of dressing to reach the office at 9:30."15 Such diary revelations have direct ties to numerous future Benchley essays, such as "Sporting Life in America: Dozing," where he horizontally reviews reasons to prolong his stay in bed"If we leave dressing until we get to the office, snatching our clothes from the chair and carrying them downtown on our arm, there might even be half an hour more for a good, health-giving nap"16 But I am reminded most of the close to Benchleys award-winning film short How to Sleep, where the 87 humorist, as voice-over narrator, describes the comic insomniac (also played by Benchley)"he stays wide awake until just before its time for the alarm clock to go off. Then sleep begins to creep up on him." Benchleys comically inspired ability to expound at length on everyday trivia/frustration remains part of his ongoing appeal. He gives comic voice to the little questions and/or irritations with which we all deal, but which we seldom articulate. Though his diary entries are hardly essay length, they occasionally suggest a similar attention to detail. For instance, his June 5, 1913, notation has a footnotea diary footnote! A passing reference to "the Eisner Hut in Rotterdam" has the asterisked addition: "One year laterOn re-reading this, it seems that the author [Benchley] was slightly confused here, for he never was in Rotterdam, Doubtless he refers to Rottenburg, where there is an Eisner Hut."17 Besides being an amusing extension of the nebulous, Benchley provides an excellent description of his later comic persona, "slightly confused here" (anticipating the famous future portrayal of Thurbers antiheroic alter ego as having "a sheer grasp of confusion"). Since Benchley later re-read his diary entries (to the point of adding a funny footnote), it suggests an even more possible diary influence on the subsequent essays. Regardless, a pivotal expanded Benchley look at lifes trifles occurs in "Rapping the Wrapper!" The humorist expounds on the inherent traumas of opening a roll of mintsthe "end had been clamped down by a stamping machine usually reserved for tinning sardines. I tried biting at both ends (one after the other, naturally) and gave up just before an inlay came out."18 But since the everyday trivia was his forte, quality examples abound, such as "Do Insects Think?," "Back in Line" (where he reveals "six-tenths of the population of the United States spend their entire lives standing in line in a post office"),19 and the valuable lessons of "How to Break 90 in Croquet":
Going beyond the comic universality of Benchleys everyday topics, humor theorist Hamlin Hill suggests another level of significance. As if directly addressing Benchleys comedy, Hill observes: the modern antihero is "incapable of inventing homespun maxims about hundred-megaton bombs, or of feeling any native self-confidence in the face of uncontrollable fallout." The antihero eventually deals with this frightening outside world by not dealing with it at all. Instead, he focuses "microscopically upon the individual unit . . . that interior realityor 88 hysteria. . . . In consequence, modern humor deals significantly with frustrating trivia."21 Though recent East-West détente has lessened fear, there are enough other global anxieties to maintain a comic trivia escape valve. This natural Hill-Benchley connection was anticipated years earlier in humorist/historian/theorist Stephen Leacocks The Greatest Pages of American Humor (1936). Praising Benchleys work as totally escapist, Leacock introduces his remarks on the then contemporary humorist by noting, "We live . . . in an age [Depression and approaching war] of preoccupation, of apprehension, of fear. All the old dead certainties are gone. Mankind, restless and distressed, is passing into a kind of mass hysteria of apprehension."22 Benchley himself observed in a comic profile of H. G. Wells that he was bemusingly put off by the celebrated authors ongoingly gung-ho attempt to involve the reader in his latest solution to global problems: "I personally have but little facility for world-repairing. I havent the slightest idea of how one would go about making things better."23 But what if an event occurred under the antiheros nose? Benchley, in a well-documented comic study ("Johnny-on-the-Spot") of "news-photographs" taken of "cataclysmic events" finds:
Fourth, as the later poet laureate of comic absurdity, à la "dementia praecox," Benchleys diaries make varied references to this phenomenon. Leacocks own "crazy comedy" influence on Benchley is a matter of record. But an extensive 1990 interview with Benchleys daughter-in-law Marjorie, executor of the familys papers at Boston University, convinces me the humorists mother was the more significant influence.25 (See my aforementioned Humor article.) Regardless, his diaries are not without comic absurdities. For example, framed between the most civilized of activitiesattending church and lunching at the Harvard Clubone entry reveals extremely anarchic comic emotions:
89 It is the contrasting (pleasantly proper) framing device, however, which transposes this humor to a touch of the absurd. A less elaborate non sequitur example from the Benchley diary would be the comment: "[I] took a little exercise in the form of a shave about eleven."27 This technique is a given in his later writing, such as the "Roll Your Own" listing of tennis court surfaces: "grass, clay, and cornmeal."28 And the complete non sequitur focus of "Holt! [sic] Who Goes There?"a series of clinical child-rearing questions with zany answers: "How should the infant be held during dressing and undressing? Any carpenter will be glad to sell you a vise which can be attached to the edge of the table."29 Benchley increases comic absurdity by merely intensifying the non sequitur sequence, be it the aforementioned gas main explosion diary example, or his wonderfully demented essay, "An Interview with Mussolini":
(As a side note, this verbal slapstick is perfectly fitting for a figure whose hold on even everyday reality is slipshod at best, let alone when he makes a relatively rare excursion into the political arena.) Benchleys diary is also awake to the modest point of view absurdities of day-to-day life, especially if that life is briefly anchored in the advertising world: "Woodrow Wilson was inaugurated President today [February 26, 1913]. In spite of that fact, Dick [office colleague] and I spent the whole day practically on Beech Nut Peanut Butter [account], searching for elusive words of taste and savour."31 A fifth and final connection between the diary and the later essays is a casually anti-social attitude. His June 20, 1912, diary entry reads: "I didnt get mine today [college degree] because I flunked the gov[ernment] 4 exam. I took [it] in bed [presumably ill; hypochondriac tendencies as an adult]. Nothing serious as I can make it up in the fall."32 And while 90 accounting merited ("I never knew less about a course"), there was a naughty little boy-like pleasure over his language skills: "much elated to find I could read a french [sic] book on the subject [human reproduction]. Nothing is easier to read than French that you oughtnt to read."33 Benchley was later at his comic essay best when skewering that same education, as in "What College Did to Me": "My courses were all selected with a definite aim in view. . .no classes before eleven in the morning or after two-thirty in the afternoon. . . On that rock was my education built."34 This casually fifth columnist diary tone is hardly limited to entries on college. It ranges from thoughts on the cost of a family (what is "the minimum marrying wage"?), to sandbagging: "Spent most of the morning writing letters on the companys time."35 These sneak preview connections between the Benchley diaries and his later essays are important for four reasons. First, they provide a pricelessly more complete view of Benchleys evolution as a comic antihero writer. That his later humor style (from slang terms and meandering organization, to comic directness about trivia) should find roots in his diaries gives new meaning to Benchleys forever casual tone. Second, the diaries further link the private person with the public persona, underlining the carryover from real life. Third (though unpublished), these early diaries further document his pioneer status in antiheroic writing. And fourth, coming well before his fame as a writer/ humorist, the diaries provide a candidly fresh and pleasantly entertaining look at a pivotal American humorist. Indeed, their inspired comic nature alone would be reason enough to celebrate this case of Benchley lost and found. Ball State University
Notes 1Maxine
Block, ed. "Robert (Charles) Benchley," in Current Biography 1941 (New
York: H.H. Wilson, 1942), p. 63. 91 4Burton Bernstein, Thurber:
A Biography (1975; rpt. New York: Ballantine Books, 1976), p. 227. 92 22Stephen Leacock, The
Greatest Pages of American Humor (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Doran &
Company, Inc., 1936), p. 230. 93 |